Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Sheehy Alexandria, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 16, 2002No. CIV.A.02-466-APublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
This action arises from the sale and spot delivery 1 of an automobile. The consumer drove away in the automobile after signing a first sales agreement conditioned on certain financing. When that financing fell through, the consumer returned to the dealership some ten days later and signed a second sales agreement, which was backdated ten days and based on different financing.
The novel question presented is whether the disclosures in the second agreement violate the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., by calculating the annual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carrie Mars v. Spartanburg Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. And First National Bank of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Cades v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Jeffrey Strange v. Monogram Credit Card Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Chrisom Polk v. Crown Auto, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Raceway Ford CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Barnes v. West, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.