Legal Opinion

Tiano v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1980No. Docket 44503PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. E. Clements, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from a March 16, 1979, order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs had brought suit against the defendant insurance company seeking recovery of a $300,000 consent judgment which had previously been entered in favor of the plaintiffs against William J. Pry, a heating and plumbing contractor who had an insurance policy with the defendant. Summary judgment was granted based on "products hazard” and ”com*179pleted operations” exclusions contained in the policy issued to Pry.

In September of 1971, Joseph Tiano, age 2, was burned when a hot water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martinez Ex Rel. Sprague v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Abco Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Haugen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. of LansingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Rhinebeck Bicycle Shop, Inc. v. Sterling InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. Jones v. Philip Atkins Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. St. Paul Insurance v. BischoffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API