Legal Opinion

Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1980No. Docket 46110PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.

Plaintiffs are builders who carry comprehensive general liability insurance policies with defendant. When a lawsuit for damages was brought against plaintiffs by William Harding and Delphine Harding, as purchasers, arising out of a building contract for the construction and sale of a new house, a dispute arose between plaintiffs and defendant concerning coverage under the insurance policy. Defendant undertook the defense under a reservation of rights understanding. During trial, this claim against plaintiffs was settled for $50,000, one-half of which was contributed by each, i.e., by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haugan v. Home Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Shepard Marine Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Francis v. ScheperMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bond Bros., Inc. v. ROBINSON AMERICAN INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Vector Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API