Legal Opinion
In Re Rollinson
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 19, 2002No. 19-50202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIEF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE
ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor’s Motion to Reopen Case to Amend Schedule F and Add Creditor (“Motion to Reopen”), Doc. I.D. No. 8, and the Objection to Motion to Reopen and Add Creditor (“Objection”), Doc. I.D. No. 14, of the proposed new creditor, Robert J. Penzerro (“New Creditor”), whose claim (“Claim”) was not listed or scheduled during the pendency of the Debtor’s bankruptcy case, are presently before the Court for resolution under somewhat unusual circumstances. Initially, the Motion to Reopen and the Objection…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re MendiolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re MadajCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Keenom v. All American Marketing (In Re Keenom)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- First National Insurance Co. of America v. Bartomeli (In Re Bartomeli)District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Horizon Aviation of Virginia, Inc. v. AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- In re MohammedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In Re BolandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- In Re RefinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.