Legal Opinion

In Re Refino

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 5, 2003No. 19-50201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO REOPEN NO ASSET CHAPTER 7 CASE TO CREDITORS

LORRAINE MURPHY WEIL, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the court is the above-captioned debtor’s (the “Debtor”) Motion To Reopen (Doc. I.D. No. 8, the “Motion”) this chapter 7 case to add creditors omitted from the Debtor’s schedules and matrix. 1

I. FACTS

The Debtor commenced this case by voluntary petition filed on May 26, 1999. (See Doc. I.D. No. 1.) The Debtor filed her schedules and statement of financial affairs (collectively, with the Summary of Schedules, the Debtor’s lists and matrix, the “Schedules”) at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Watson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re WoolardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. In Re BolandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  5. In Re RollinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MohammedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. De Barros v. From You Flower, LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021
  3. In re NephewUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API