Shaw v. Moon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
The sole question, arising on general demurrer, is whether the complaint herein states a cause of action against the defendants, or either of them. Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain “Drive Clamp,” an apparatus used in well drilling, and which is of the reasonable value of $20; that the defendant Moon, maliciously and without probable cause, procured the defendant Fortner, as recorder and ex-officio justice of the peace .of the City of 'Wasco, to issue a search-warrant as follows:
“In the Recorder’s Court of the City of Wasco, County of Sherman,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Calhoun v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Rush v. BuckleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.