Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Bradbury

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1891No. 13004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.!

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action of ejectment to recover possession of an engine lot reserved to the city of San Francisco by virtue of the Van Ness ordinance. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for a portion of the land sued for, and in favor of the intervener for the remainder. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant Bradbury, and denied, and from this order, as well as the judgment, he has appealed. The court finds as facts in the case, that the land sued for had been reserved for public use as a fire-engine lot, and that the defendant Bradbury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Bd. of Educ. of S.F. v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Goldman v. QuadratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API