Bd. of Educ. of S.F. v. Donahue
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Crockett, J.:
The action is ejectment for a lot in the Mission Addition of the City of San Francisco, and is included in the territory embraced by the Van Ness Ordinance, so called. The. defendant was in possession at the commencement of the action, but at the trial showed no title or right to the possession, except such as is to be inferred from the fact of possession. J udgment was entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground, amongst others, that the judgment and decision of the Court were not justified by the evidence. The motion was denied…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Light v. Canadian County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- City & County of San Francisco v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Board of Education v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880