Legal Opinion
Innes v. State Banking Board
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1923No. 5906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
The motion for leave to file the petition for mandamus in this case was overruled on May 9, 1923.
We are asked to consider relator's motion for rehearing filed herein, and to permit the petition to be filed. We have concluded to consider the motion because of the importance of the questions involved, although it has not been the practice of this Court, at least in recent years, to permit the filing of motions for rehearing on orders overruling motions for leave to file petitions for mandamus.
Applying the reasons for the rule announced in Hines v. Morse,92 Tex. 194, 47…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Depoyster v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Munson v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Hines v. MorseTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Shirley & Holland v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brand v. San Patricio CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Shaw v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936