Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1985No. 84-237PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The key question in this case, on undisputed facts, is this: When the owner of the record title to a tract of land conveys an undivided half-interest in the minerals to another person, but the mineral deed is not recorded for 18 years, and a stranger to the title takes adverse possession of the land a year after the execution of the unrecorded mineral deed and continues his adverse possession for more than seven years, does the adverse possessor acquire title to the constructively severed half-interest in the minerals? The chancellor correctly decided that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Claybrooke v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. United Fuel Gas Co. v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  5. Brewer v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bonds v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Peterson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Rice v. First Arkansas Valley Bank (In Re May)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
  4. Phelps v. Justiss Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Duvall v. Carr-PoolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API