Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1985No. 85-1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

This quiet title action presents questions about oil, gas or mineral rights, thus jurisdiction is in this Court pursuant to our Rule 29(l)(n). The first point for reversal raised by the plaintiffs, appellants, concerns the construction to be given a warranty deed. In the deed, the owner of a fractional mineral interest purports to convey a larger interest than can be granted because of another outstanding fractional mineral interest and the grantor’s own purported reservation of a fractional interest in the minerals. The trial judge was correct in ruling that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gilbertson v. CharlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Taylor v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Opaline King Hill v. GilliamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Deltic Timber Corp. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Mauldin v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Senterra, Ltd. v. WinlandOhio Supreme Court · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API