Legal Opinion

Christlieb v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

It is here sought, by writ of certiorari, to review the action of the board of county commissioners, in April, 1889, organizing a new town out of a part of the town of Medina, and also, as bearing upon that, the previous action of the same body in 1868, and again in 1884, detaching certain territory from the town of Excelsior, and attaching it to the town of Medina. These acts were purely po*143litical or legislative in their nature, and will not be reviewed on certiorari. In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145, (19 N. W. Rep. 723;). Lamont v. County of Dodge, 39 Minn. 385, (40 N. W. Rep. 359.) That the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Gale v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Lemont v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moede v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Hardy v. CloughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Fitzgerald v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Huntley School District No. 4 JT. v. SchweickhardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. In re JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API