State ex rel. Gale v. Ueland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Writ of prohibition directed to respondent as judge of the probate court of Hennepin county.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
This is an application for an absolute writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent, the judge of probate of Hen-nepin county, from making an order under Gen. St. 1878, c. 10, § 124, declaring certain territory in the town of, and adjoining the city of, Minneapolis to be duly incorporated as a city by the name of Minnehaha. The part of section 124 conferring authority on judges of probate to. make such orders reads thus: “Whenever two-thirds of the legal voters residing within the limits of a territory comprising not less than 2,000 inhabitants, and not more than 15,000, and which territory…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Young v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State ex. rel. Dakota Trust Co. v. StutsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Hilton v. City of NashwaukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Foreman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.