Legal Opinion
Kice Industries, Inc. v. AWC Coatings, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 3, 2003No. 01-1359-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The present case involves allegedly defective paint. Plaintiff Kice Industries has brought the action against defendants AWC Coatings, Inc., The Glidden Company and Insl-X Products Corporation. Glidden and Insl-X are manufacturers of paint. AWC sells paint. Kice alleges that both Glidden and Insl-X are liable for negligence and breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and that Glidden is additionally liable for negligent misrepresentation, for breach of express warranty, and for breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Richard D. Ellis v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lexington Ins. Co. v. Western Roofing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004