Legal Opinion
Weigman v. Everest Institute
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 30, 2013No. Civ. No. 12-1834 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Karen Weigman filed this action against her former employer, Defendant Everest Institute (“Everest”), alleging she was terminated in violation of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act and public policy for confronting her supervisor about what she believed to be the forgery of internal documents. Everest now moves for summary judgment on Weigman’s claims, and, for the reasons set forth below, its Motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are recited in the light most favorable to Weigman.
In May 2010, Weigman was hired…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pedersen v. Bio-Medical ApplicationsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Becker v. Jostens, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Olinger v. Renville CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019