Legal Opinion

Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. Lehman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 21, 1997No. Civil Action No. 95-318 SSHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

The following pleadings now are before the Court:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

2. Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment;

3. Plaintiffs Statement of Objections to the Commissioner’s Statement of Material Facts as to Which There is No Genuine Issue and Plaintiffs Statement of Facts to Which There is No Genuine Issue in Support of Hallmark’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment;

4. Intervenor’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter “Intervenor’s Motion To Dismiss”);

5.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sykes v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API