Legal Opinion
Hynds v. Schaff
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1931No. 258PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
The appellants Sam I. Hynds, as receiver, and as trustee for the two insurance companies, and those companies brought this action against the receiver for the railway company. They alleged in their petition that 171 bales of cotton, the property of Hynds as receiver, located on the railroad platform at Kiowa, Okl., for shipment, was insured by the companies, and on November 9,1920, 30 hales of the cotton and two days later 63 additional hales were burned; that he made proofs of loss to the insurance companies and they paid the losses, aggregating $9,718.99, for which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Ins. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MobleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Staples v. Central Surety & Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Kentwood Lumber Co. v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933