Legal Opinion

Baird v. Reinertson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1934No. File No. 6218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurjke, J.

On the 13th day of October, 1930, the Merchants Bank at Hurdsfield, North Dakota, passed into the hands of the plaintiff, as receiver. J. E. Band was put in charge of the liquidation of said bank and was steadily employed there at until the 28th day of November, 1932, at the time of the. trial. The books of said bank showed an entry, on October 2, 1930, of a deposit of $9,185.39 in the Eirst National Bank of Fessenden, North Dakota, to the credit of the said Merchants Bank at Hurdsfield. The only withdrawal of said deposit, as shown by the books of the Hurdsfield Bank, is the sum of $17.35.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hadlock, State Bank Com'r v. Callister.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wasson v. WootenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API