Legal Opinion
Muller v. Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 24, 1903No. 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. ■
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
Jean Muller, the plaintiff in error, a Swiss immigrant, landed at Philadelphia in April, 1900. He spoke no English, had no relatives in this country, and, indeed, no acquaintances, save one Ghaul, with whom he boarded. He found employment at Cramps’ Shipyards. On May 18th he was forcibly ejected from a street car while in motion by a conductor and badly injured. He was removed to a hospital in an unconscious condition, and so remained for two or three days. On his return to consciousness he was in a pitiable state. As a result of his injuries he had either become…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- County of Chester v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FitzsimonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Herman v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926