Legal Opinion

Shuster v. Finan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Harvey District Court. At the March Term 1876 of the district court, Finan had judgment, and Shuster brings the case here. All necessary facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

In an action before a justice of the peace certain property was attached as the property of the defendant therein. The defendant in error interposed in that action, under and by virtue of ch. 164 of the laws of 1872, as a claimant of the property attached. A jury was demanded to try this claim. After the trial had been progressing for three days, and before its close, the following proceedings were had and entered upon the docket of said justice, to-wit:

“Now comes the claimant in person, and by his attorneys Ady & Eeid, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Missouri Railroad v. AkersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  2. Carver v. James Shelly & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Reedy v. GiftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ohio Hydrate & Supply Co. v. H. W. Underhill Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Ennor v. RaineNevada Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hodgin v. BartonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Berroth v. McElvainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Dilley v. McGregorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API