Legal Opinion

Reedy v. Gift

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Marshall County. The “ petition on appeal ” filed in the District Court on the appeal of this case by plaintiff, set forth: “ The said plaintiff, George Needy, complains of Mary Miller, Peter Gift, and A. Taught, for that on the 21st day of February, A. D. 1863, they executed their certain bond in an action of replevin then pending before William P. Hess, a justice of the peace for Marysville township, Marshall County, Kansas, in an action of replevin, wherein…

Read the full summary

Error from Marshall County. The “ petition on appeal ” filed in the District Court on the appeal of this case by plaintiff, set forth: “ The said plaintiff, George Needy, complains of Mary Miller, Peter Gift, and A. Taught, for that on the 21st day of February, A. D. 1863, they executed their certain bond in an action of replevin then pending before William P. Hess, a justice of the peace for Marysville township, Marshall County, Kansas, in an action of replevin, wherein Mary Miller was plaintiff and George Needy was defendant, which bond was then and there approved by George D. Swearinger,…

1Opinion of the Court

JBy the Court,

Crozier, O. J.

One Mary Miller brought a suit in replevin before John S. Lucklin, a justice of the peace, against George Reedy, the plaintiff in error, for the recovery of a sorrel mare. The writ' was served and the property delivered to Mrs. *398Miller, who executed a bond in the ordinary form, with Gift and Taught, the defendants in error, as her sureties. Mrs. Miller failed to prosecute her action, and judgment was rendered against her for one hundred dollars and costs; upon which judgment execution was issued and returned, “ no goods.” Suit was then brought by Eeedy before E. 0.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fooshee Brunson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Shuster v. FinanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Hodgin v. BartonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Martin v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wright v. LinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API