Legal Opinion
Bellikoff v. Eaton Vance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 15, 2007No. Docket No. 05-6957-cvPublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs in this case are a group of investors in various Eaton Vance mutual funds. They brought this putative class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Koeltl, J.) to recover for wrongs they allege to have suffered at the hands of the *114Eaton Vance corporate empire and several affiliated entities.
The vehicle chosen to right these perceived wrongs was the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “ICA”), which, for all of its protections, does little for the plaintiffs in this case. On appeal, we are principally concerned with whether there are implied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Marshall v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Jordan v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.