Legal Opinion

State v. Glossbrener

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2002No. 71655-2PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

— Petitioner, Ellwood Glossbrener, seeks review of his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He argues that at the time of the search of the passenger compartment of his vehicle, which led to the discovery of the controlled substance, the officer did not have an objectively reasonable concern for his safety. We agree.

I

At approximately 11:45 p.m. on November 8, 1999, Union Gap police officer Carlos Trevino pulled Glossbrener over because his passenger side headlight was not operating. Glossbrener stopped within one-half block. Before coming to a complete stop, the officer…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. GlossbrenerWashington Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API