Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2014No. 89253-9PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 In certain situations, a police officer may briefly frisk a person to search for weapons that might pose a risk to officer and bystander safety. When justified, these protective frisks do not violate the constitutional prohibi*864tion against unreasonable invasions of individual privacy. In this case, we are asked to further define the permissible scope of these protective frisks. An officer stopped Tanner Zachary Roy Russell for violating several minor traffic laws. The officer recognized Russell from a previous encounter where Russell told officers he was not armed, when in fact he had a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BoisselleWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Norman Granvel RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Matthew Christopher CherryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State of Washington v. Eric Daniel CruzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API