Legal Opinion

Douglas Estes v. Kentucky Utilities Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1980No. 79-3038PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOINER, District Judge.

Plaintiff appeals in this ease from a decision of the district court granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. He asserts that the district court committed error in granting defendant leave to amend its answer to assert the affirmative defense on which the motion for summary judgment was based, 41 months after its original answer was filed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the district court.

In this diversity action, plaintiff seeks common law tort damages from defendant for injuries suffered while he was cleaning defendant’s street lights.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Laura Hayden v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. McGraw v. MatthaeiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
  4. Garrison v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Lrl Properties v. Portage Metro Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Rose Marks, D/B/A Middlebelt-Eureka Shell v. Shell Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Super Sulky, Inc. v. United States Trotting AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. King Ex Rel. Estate of King v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API