Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Coleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1972No. Civ. 38837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

Appellant appeals from an order of the court: (1) denying his motion to strike prior orders awarding attorney’s fees and costs to respondent’s attorney subsequent to an interlocutory judgment of dissolution; (2) awarding fees and costs on that motion.

An interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage between the parties was made and filed. That judgment (paragraph VIII) provided in part: “Respondent [wife] having waived alimony [spousal support] in open Court, her request for alimony [spousal support] is denied.”

Subsequent to the interlocutory judgment of dissolution,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. See v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In Re Marriage of NewportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. In Re Marriage of NewportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. In Re Marriage of NewportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API