In Re Marriage of Pollard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P, J.
The only issue in this appeal is the propriety of a court order, issued following a hearing on appellant’s order to show cause re modification of visitation, which required that appellant, a welfare recipient who had not been able to afford counsel for himself, pay $200 in attorney’s fees for counsel for his ex-wife. This order was entirely prospective in nature, as appellant was not required to begin payments until his income, which was $220 per month at the time the order was made, exceeded $500 per month.
Before reviewing the pertinent background facts of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gonzales v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Perry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In Re Marriage of ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lee v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Marriage of HearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023