Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. F. M. Reeves and Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1959No. 6125PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
In this proceeding the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order requiring F. M. Reeves and Sons, Inc., herein referred to as “respondent,” to bargain with Local Union No. 492 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees in an appropriate unit, to cease and desist from unilaterally offering wage increases or other employee benefits, and also upon unconditional request to return any striking employee to his employment. The order was based on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. F. McKenzie Davison, W. J. Hardy, Sr., and W. J. Hardy, Jr., D/B/A Arlington Asphalt CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. George J. Roberts & Sons, Inc., D/B/A the Roberts PressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Southwestern Colorado Contractors Association and Its MembersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. American Compress Warehouse, Division of Frost-Whited Company, Inc.,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. George Groh and SonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.