State ex rel. Watkins v. Eighth District Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Motion to Intervene
Cleveland Clinic seeks to intervene as a respondent. Cleveland Clinic is the appellant in the underlying proceeding stayed by the court of appeals. Based on our duty to liberally construe Civ.R. 24 in favor of intervention, Cleveland Clinic’s compliance with the mandatory procedural requirements of Civ.R. 24(C), and relators’ failure to object to Cleveland Clinic’s intervention, we grant Cleveland Clinic’s motion and allow it to intervene as a respondent here. State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 184, 685 N.E.2d 507,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Charvat v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.