Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Quinn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

This is a divorce suit. Complainant, Amzle Quinn, avers in his bill that defendant, Nettie Hill Quinn, willfully or maliciously deserted or absented herself from him, without reasonable cause, for two whole years, and that she was guilty of such cruel and inhuman treatment or conduct toward him as rendered cohabitation unsafe and improper.

It is averred that defendant deserted complainant on the — day of October, 1931, and that on June 7, 1932, defendant was legally committed to the Western State Hospital for Insane at Bolivar, Tennessee, and has been confined there ever since.

Process was duly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garnett v. GarnettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Albee v. AlbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Wray v. WraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Harrigan v. HarriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hernández Torres ex rel. Zapater Hernández v. Zapater MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  5. Chastain v. ChastainTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API