Chastain v. Chastain
Tennessee Supreme Court
1DissentHarbison, Justice
I respectfully dissent. In my opinion a trial judge, even in the hearing of an uncontested divorce case, has discretion to dismiss the action when the proof shows that the complaining party admittedly has been guilty of adultery.
I am not in agreement with the majority opinion to the effect that the substantive law governing divorce is wholly statutory, and there are no principles of equity involved.
In the old case of Cameron v. Cameron, 42 Tenn. 375 (1865), the Court approved the dismissal of an uncontested divorce action brought by a husband against his wife on charges of adultery. In that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schwalb v. SchwalbCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
- Turner v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Brewies v. BrewiesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
- Canning v. CanningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.