Legal Opinion

Harrigan v. Harrigan

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1902No. Sac. No. 838PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Appeal from the judgment denying plaintiff a divorce.

It appears from the findings that on the ninth day of September, 1894, the defendant willfully deserted the plaintiff, and that such desertion continued for more than one year, when defendant became insane, and was duly committed to the State Hospital for the Insane at Napa, where he has ever since remained. This appeal presents the sole question as to whether or not a divorce can be granted against an insane defendant whose insanity did not exist at the time the right to a divorce accrued. Under our laws marriage is a civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglass v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Mansfield v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Rathbun v. RathbunNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Stratford v. . StratfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hernández Torres ex rel. Zapater Hernández v. Zapater MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Dunn v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Steed v. SteedUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Andrews v. Andrews' CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API