Legal Opinion

Jade Waichulaitis, et al. v. Michael Sloat, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00900Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jade Waichulaitis, et al., No. CV-25-00900-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Michael Sloat, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants City of Chandler (the “City”), Lydia Ravelo, 16 Matthew Loper, Matthew Figley, Hiago Pereira, and Ryan Stover’s (collectively, the “City 17 Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Doc. 29). 18 The Motion has been fully briefed. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part 19 Defendants’ Motion. 20 I.…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API