Legal Opinion
In Re Gibson Group, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 25, 1993No. Bankruptcy 1-90-00280PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON OBJECTION OF UCC TO SECTION 3.4 OF PLAN
BURTON PERLMAN, Chief Judge.
Second Amended Plan (the “plan”) in this case has been confirmed. The plan includes a provision, Section 3.4, which deals with the order of payment of certain monies to creditor Chase Bank. Prior to confirmation, the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee (“UCC”) had objected to that provision. The plan itself provided that the question reserved by the UCC could be decided after confirmation. A hearing on the objection by the UCC was subsequently held. That objection goes to the order of payment to Chase Bank. Resolution…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- Allstate Financial Corp. v. Westfield Service Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Tidwell (In Re McElwaney)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re BorgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of High Strength Steel, Inc. Ex Rel. Estate of High Strength Steel, Inc. v. Lozinski (In Re High Strength Steel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- InRe: Pittsburgh-Can v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004