Legal Opinion
Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 3, 2004No. 03-8030Published
1Opinion of the Court
309 B.R. 277 (2004)
In re PITTSBURGH-CANFIELD CORPORATION, et al., Debtors.
Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corporation, the Valspar Corporation, and Mississippi Lime Company, Appellants,
v.
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, Debtor-Appellee.
No. 03-8030.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit.
Argued November 5, 2003.
Decided and Filed May 3, 2004.
ARGUED: Kim Martin Lewis, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellants.
ARGUED: Michael E. Wiles, Debevoise & Plimpton, New York City, for Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Kim Martin Lewis, Tim H. Robinson, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, David L.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re Laguna Associates Limited Partnership, Debtor. Laguna Associates Limited Partnership v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, in Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee, Intervenor Below. In Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee, Intervenor BelowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Toshiba America, Inc. v. Video King of Illinois, Inc. (In Re Video King of Illinois, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Darrell Edward Stevens v. McGinnis Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.