Don Houston, M.D., Inc. v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Appellant Dr. Don Houston challenges the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of appellees. The trial court ruled that appel-lees are entitled to judgment, as a matter of law, because (1) they are immune, both statutorily and by hospital bylaws, from liability because they acted in good faith, and (2) they substantially complied with hospital bylaws in suspending Dr. Houston’s surgical privileges. We affirm.
FACTS 1
Dr. Houston was a surgeon with full surgical privileges at Dixie Medical Center (the Hospital), in St, George, Utah, commencing in 1978. In March 1982, a peer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State CollegeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Mahmoodian v. United Hospital Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kennedy v. New Era Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Granger v. Christus Health Central LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Janda v. Madera Community HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
- MacArthur v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
- Brown's Shoe Fit Co. v. OlchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.