Chapman v. Chapman
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This appeal arises from a jury verdict in a premises liability case in favor of Respondents Vondel and Becky Chapman. Kay Chapman (Kay) appeals, asserting that the district court erred by excluding testimony from her expert witness and refusing to give some of Kay’s requested jury instructions. Kay also asserts that the jury’s verdict is not supported by the evidence presented at trial. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The material facts of this case are not in dispute. On March 19, 2005, Kay visited Respondents’ home as a guest at a surprise birthday party. After…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. EllingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Joseph Bolognese v. Paul ForteIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Kuhn v. COLDWELL BANKER LANDMARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Larry Hansen v. Matthew RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.