Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Chapman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2009No. 34614PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict in a premises liability case in favor of Respondents Vondel and Becky Chapman. Kay Chapman (Kay) appeals, asserting that the district court erred by excluding testimony from her expert witness and refusing to give some of Kay’s requested jury instructions. Kay also asserts that the jury’s verdict is not supported by the evidence presented at trial. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. On March 19, 2005, Kay visited Respondents’ home as a guest at a surprise birthday party. After…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. EllingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Joseph Bolognese v. Paul ForteIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kuhn v. COLDWELL BANKER LANDMARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Larry Hansen v. Matthew RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API