Legal Opinion
Aronwald v. Sperber
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 14, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWecht, J.
This is an action by two purchasers against a retail butcher for damages, under subdivision (e) of section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [TJ. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925, subd. (e)], for violating Maximum Price Regulation 394, covering meats, and Maximum Price Regulation 423, covering poultry. (Commerce Clearing House, War Law Service, Price Control, Yol. 3, ¶¶ 43,594; 43,623.)
The sole issue submitted to a jury was whether or not the defendant asked and received more than the prices fixed by the schedules hereinabove referred to and promulgated by the Office of Price…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Fisher v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Griffin v. Interurban Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Suydam v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hilgreen v. . Cleaners Tailors Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. v. Manikas, New York County Courts1958
- Grzybicki v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- People v. McDonaldGeneva City Court · 1979