Legal Opinion
Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. v. Manikas
New York County Courts
Decided April 1, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmund A. McCarthy, J.
This is a motion presented by the defendant for an order directing the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff and striking out the complaint of the plaintiff herein. This action was commenced on January 10,1958 by the service of a summons and verified complaint.
The complaint alleges that on or about October 11, 1957 at Herkimer, the Trio-Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc., of Herkimer, and the defendant Theodore John Manikas entered into a written, retail installment contract whereby the former agreed to sell and the defendant agreed to buy a 1951 super de luxe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. OrnsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Aronwald v. SperberCity of New York Municipal Court · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. Bayless, New York County Courts1977
- Brian Maloney, M.D., P. C. v. MaloneyNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Perl v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Freeman v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.