Legal Opinion

Livingstone v. Rebman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1959No. 35594Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

In its opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court, the Court of Appeals said:

“In attempting to vacate a judgment under such circumstances what needs to be shown is prima facie proof supporting the defense. But the defense which is presented here is that the note is a forgery upon which the defendants are not bound. Either such claim is true or is not true. The same proof is required on the motion [petition] as on the merits. It must follow, therefore, that even though the rule be as just stated, a trial judge is not required in all events to give cred*112ence to the incredible in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canal Winchester Bank v. ExlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Bellows v. BowlusOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Washington v. LevinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Weaver v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Mosher v. GossOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API