Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 34,269PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a suit to require defendant to remove a side track from Richmond street, formerly North street, in the city of Grand Rapids. Defendant claims prescriptive easement through adverse possession of the street for over 15 years, prior to the enactment of Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1907, superseded by 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12311, par. 3. Only the general situation will here be set up as a more detailed statement of the early history of the track may be found, by any one interested, in Kent Furniture Manfg. Co. v. Long, 111 Mich. 383.

The track was originally laid in 1869 by A. B. Long & Sons,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butler v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Weber v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of St. Joseph v. SeelMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Houghton County v. MassieMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krisher v. DuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cox v. GodecSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Prince v. Charles Ilfeld CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Cox v. GodecSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API