Legal Opinion

Pendill v. Marquette County Agricultural Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought ejectment, claiming title in fee to the premises, described in their declaration, and proved a perfect title from the federal government. The defenses made are—

1. That plaintiffs are estopped from asserting their title against defendant.

2. That defendant has acquired title by adverse possession.

The ancestor of plaintiff Pendill, one James P. Pendill, was the, owner of a tax title covering the land in controversy, upon which an Auditor General's deed had issued to him. After his death, plaintiff Pendill, and the other heirs and the widow of the decedent, joined in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Jackson ex dem. Varick v. WaldronCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1834
  3. Yelverton v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richards v. TibaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Klever v. KleverMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Butler v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Duffy v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dummer v. United States Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API