Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McNutt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1992No. CA 91-16PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gwin, Judge.

Defendants-appellants, Donald and Patty McNutt (“appellants”), appeal from the judgment entered in the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas permanently enjoining appellants from interfering with the use of an easement located on their property and owned by plaintiff-appellee, state of Ohio, Department of Natural Resources (“state”). Appellants’ assignments of error are attached hereto and made a part of this opinion. 1

Facts

In 1958, the state acquired a right-of-way easement by deed from the United States of America. The original grant of this easement was made in 1887 by Stuart…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Berardi v. Ohio Turnpike Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Methodist Prot. Church v. LawsHamilton Circuit Court · 1893
  4. Methodist Protestant Church v. LawsOhio Circuit Courts · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Walbridge v. CarrollOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Heartz v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Moneywatch Companies v. WilbersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. v. 1200 West Ninth Street Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Diemling v. KimbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API