Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Ponca City Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 15861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Only one question is presented and argued upon the merits of the case, and that is as to the pnoper construction of the consignment, contract. Omitting formal parts the consignment contract involved reads as follows:

“This agreement witnesseth that L. C. Utley, of Asher, is hereby constituted an agent for the Ponca City Milling Company, to handle the grain products of said company in the town of Asher, state of Oklahoma. Said products to be sold for cash at a price to net the Ponca City Milling Company, the amount specified in the invoice sent at time of shipment.
“-Said…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Ahrens Refrigerator Co. v. R. H. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. United States ex rel. Bachman & Keffer Construction Co. v. H. G. Cozad Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Town of BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. United States v. Cozad Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API