Legal Opinion

United States v. Cozad Construction Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1963No. 7247_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

324 F.2d 617

The UNITED STATES of America for the Use of BACHMAN & KEFFER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a partnership composed of Earl Bachman and C. E. Keffer, and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellants,

v.

H. G. COZAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 7247.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 15, 1963.

Elliott C. Fenton, Edgar Fenton, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellants.

Clyde J. Watts, Oklahoma City, Okl. (John B. Hayes and Looney, Watts, Looney, Nichols & Johnson, Oklahoma City, Okl., of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Thomas v. DancerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Henderson v. Ponca City Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. United States ex rel. Bachman & Keffer Construction Co. v. H. G. Cozad Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southwestern Investment Company, a Corporation v. Cactus Motor Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Parker CullomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API