Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Bachman & Keffer Construction Co. v. H. G. Cozad Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1963No. 7247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this suit under 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a, 270b, 270c and 270d for the use and benefit of Bach-man and Heifer Construction Company (B and K) and its surety against H. G. Cozad Construction Company, Inc. (Cozad) and its surety to recover unpaid balances due B and K from Cozad under a labor and material contract. Judgment was entered by the trial court, upon recommendation of a special master, for B and K upon the allegations of the complaint for $20,586.52 and for Cozad upon the allegations of a counterclaim for $29,-616.46. The correctness of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Thomas v. DancerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Henderson v. Ponca City Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Gary v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990
- Miller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Cozad Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963