Thirsk v. Ethicon, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ENOCH, Chief Judge.
In this products liability action, defendant Ethicon, Inc., appeals from the judgments for each of the plaintiffs entered on the jury’s verdicts. We reverse and remand.
The plaintiffs, Walter Thirsk, Mack Whitaker, and Billy Hollis, whose cases were consolidated for trial, sued defendant claiming that in the course of surgery, they had become infected by a surgical bone wax manufactured by defendant. They alleged that the wax was contaminated with the organism, mycobacterium fortuitum. The cases were tried on the theory of strict liability.
I
Ethicon first contends that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Jackson v. Harsco Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Houser v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Riss & Co. v. GallowaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Forrestine D. Lemaire, by and Through Her Conservator, Howard C. Lemaire, and Howard C. Lemaire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Jacobs v. Commonwealth Highland Theatres, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Koehn v. RD Werner Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Leiting v. MuthaColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.