Cossio v. Cate (In Re Cossio)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:
The debtor moved to vacate a default judgment of nondisehargeability and dismiss the underlying complaint based on defective service of process. At issue was whether the debtor’s attorney was served with a copy of the summons and complaint as required by Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7004(b)(9), which provides for service on the debtor by mailing copies of the summons and complaint to the debtor and to his attorney. The trial court found adequate service to have been effected and denied the motion. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re Brian D. Hammer, Debtor. Brian D. Hammer v. Michael Drago and Ed SummersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Noel Mason v. Genisco Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In the Matter of Park Nursing Center, Inc., Debtor. Creditors Committee of Park Nursing Center, Inc. v. Richard SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Hammer v. Drago (In Re Hammer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Morris v. Peralta (In Re Peralta)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Levoy (In Re Levoy)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- First Delaware Life Insurance v. Wada (In Re Wada)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Salisbury (In Re Loloee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- GMAM Investment Funds Trust I v. Globo Comunicacoes E Participacoes S.A. (In Re Globo Comunicacoes E Participacoes S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.