Legal Opinion
In Re Brian D. Hammer, Debtor. Brian D. Hammer v. Michael Drago and Ed Summers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1991No. 90-15678PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZILLY, District Judge:
Debtor Brian D. Hammer appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment. In re Hammer, 112 B.R. 341 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Beginning in 1985, appellees Michael Drago and Ed Summers invested approximately $285,000 in several business enterprises under Hammer’s control. That sum was secured by what Hammer concedes were forged deeds of trust. In September 1986, Hammer filed for Chapter 7…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 67,011 in Re Joseph Robert Stone, Bankrupt. Iva E. Olson v. Joseph Robert StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Gregorian v. IzvestiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Cassidy v. TenorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- American Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. Donald C. Hayhurst Jane Doe HayhurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Zurich American Insurance v. International Fibercom, Inc. (In Re International Fibercom, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dierschke v. O'CheskeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Information Systems and Networks Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.