Legal Opinion
Wilder v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 2002No. 2:00-cv-06201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
By way of the motion now pending before this Court, Defendants seek the entry of summary judgment in their favor on all of the counts in Plaintiffs Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be granted.
Factual Background
In her complaint, Plaintiff Leah Wilder alleges that on or about November 10, 1990, she consulted Defendant Dr. Trinka Luzinski at Covenant House Health Services for a gynecologic exam and was referred for an HIV virus test. On November 19, 1990, Plaintiff was advised by “Dr. Luzinski and/or staff, agents of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lakits v. YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kornea v. J.S.D Mgmt., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Robinson v. May Department Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Calle v. York HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- JH Stevedoring Co. v. Fasig-Tipton Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.